James v Recontrust, Oregon District Court Says Noteholder is Beneficiary of Deed of Trust Not MERS
James v Recontrust et al – Order (2)This is an interesting decision. It construes Oregon’s deed of trust statutory definition of beneficiary, specifically a line that is exactly the same as Arizona’s definition of beneficiary (A.R.S. 33-801) as a designated party “for whose benefit a trust deed is given.”
