Wells Fargo Admits No Lender After Securitization

Wait, what?  Isn’t this what we have been saying? I have received a Wells Fargo document entitled “Conduit Loan Servicing: Who’s Who and What’s What?” I don’t know when this was written but it refers to the first quarter of 2010 and it bears a Wells Fargo logo and contact information of the authors. 

It’s also interesting because loan modifications are often declined with the excuse that the “investors” wouldn’t approve them.  In contrast, in 2009, in Arizona federal bankruptcy court, I heard a Wells Fargo executive in charge of loan modifications testify that they never even submitted the mods to investors because they would need 25% approval under the terms of most PSAs. 

Notice too that there is no discussion of potential conflicts that a Master SErvicer might have, if its parent company was the underwriter of the securitization and it owns the residual tranche.

Here’s the full document with an excerpt below: Conduit_Loan_Servicing wells fargo no lender

The thing most borrowers fail to realize about conduit loans is that once a loan has been securitized, they are not working with a “lender” anymore. The loans are pooled into a securitization called a Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit (REMIC). The REMIC is a trust and it has no lenders, only fiduciaries of the “certificate holders.” Once the loans have been pooled and securitized, the players are as follows:

Conduit Loan Servicing: Who’s Who and What’s What?
 Master Servicer- The Master Servicer collects payments, escrows, reserves and financial information on behalf of the REMIC Trustee. The Master Servicer visits each asset (at its expense) every year for large loans, every other year for small loans. As of the first quarter of 2010, Wells Fargo was the largest Master Servicer in the country with approximately $425 billion in servicing and over 330 securitizations. The next largest is Midland Loan Services at approximately $145 billion and 140 deals. Master Servicers are rated and evaluated by the rating agencies. If a loan becomes delinquent, the Master Servicer is usually obligated to make the first three or four payments to the certificate holders as well as pay trust expenses on delinquent assets. This way, if a borrower is late or misses a payment, but makes it up quickly, the certificate holders have had no disruption in payments. The Master Servicer is reimbursed when the borrower makes up the payment or when the property goes into foreclosure and is later sold. Because the certificate holders are relying on the Master Servicer to make these payments, the creditworthiness of the Master Servicer is a key to the selection process.
 Special Servicer– The Special Servicer is the party designated to “work-out” loans or foreclose on loans if they go into default. The Special Servicer may agree to modification, waiver or amendment of any term, extend maturity, defer or forgive interest or prepayment charges and permit the release or substitution of collateral, borrower or guarantor so long as it is “in the best interest of the certificate holders.” If a loan is in default for more than two payments (60 days) or defaults at maturity, it is assigned to the Special Servicer who takes over direct discussions with the borrower. The Special Servicer can also get involved if it gets notice of “imminent” default. The Special Servicer makes all final decisions about dispositions of defaulted property and REO. Often they are also the holders of the “first loss pieces” of the pool. Because they are taking the most risk, as part of their agreement to take that risk, they usually insist on being the Special Servicer as a requirement of their investment. There are only a handful of special servicers in the country. The top six special servicers, ranked in order of number of deals (highest to lowest), are LNR Partners, Midland Loan Services, Centerline, CW Capital, Berkadia, and J.E. Robert Cos.
 Trustee– calculates and distributes all the checks to the various tranche owners. (A tranche is a certain rank of priority for a certificate holder). Based on its priority of lien on the assets, a tranche will be rated by the ratings agencies: AAA, AA, A, BBB, etc. The lower the rating, the higher the anticipated return for the tranche (also referred to as a “class” of certificate holder). The Trustee also facilitates the distribution of servicer information to rating agencies and investors.
Pooling and Servicing Agreement (PSA) –
 The duties and obligations of each of the above parties are spelled out in the PSA. A PSA is signed by all parties when the REMIC is formed. Each PSA is unique, but very similar. The PSA also designates a “Controlling Class” who will provide input on recommendations for Special Serviced Loans and REO. The PSA usually requires the Special Servicer to obtain an appraisal once a loan is transferred to the Special Servicer. This is usually done at the borrower’s expense. The three most common issues that arise with conduit structures related to loan maturity are as follows:
1.Imminent Default. Assume that a loan has not yet matured and/or is not yet in default, but that default is imminent. The Borrower wants to talk to their “lender” to get relief in the form of an extension, an accrual, a reduction in payment or amortization, etc. Typically the borrower’s only contact is with the Master Servicer, who typically does not have the power to make any alterations to the existing loan. That power rests with the Special Servicer, who normally won’t know anything about the loan until the property goes into default, or until the borrower makes contact with them directly.

 The borrower may be willing to make the payments, and all the borrower wants is assurance that when the loan comes due the “lender” won’t pull the plug on them. Many borrowers want to know who they can talk to. They need to find a way to talk to their Special Servicer. If they do reach the Special Servicer, they should be prepared to pay for an appraisal before the Special Servicer will engage in any meaningful discussion, and also demonstrate that they have searched exhaustively for takeout financing.

2. A loan matures with no replacement lender, and the property is worth less than the current debt.
Assume that a loan is maturing and the borrower has made contact with the Special Servicer to tell them that there is no replacement financing. For purposes of this example, let’s say that the property is worth less than the debt. So, if the property were foreclosed on, the pool would take a loss. One might think that the Special Servicer would be glad to extend the loan (after all, they are the ones that take the first “hit.”)If the Special Servicer is willing to extend your loan, they have to get permission from the Controlling Class Representative (CCR), who is a fiduciary for all the certificate holders. The CCR was designated when the
REMIC was created and the PSA was signed. The largest class of certificate holders is always the AAA rated tranche who aren’t likely to lose any money if the deal gets foreclosed and sold at a discount because they have first lien on the proceeds. Without permission from the CCR, the Special Servicer could be liable if they made any decisions that did not protect all classes. This is one reason why Special Servicers may be reluctant to extend a loan. Most AAA holders are anxious to get their investment back as soon as possible. Most PSAs give the special servicers the right to extend loans up to a maximum of three years, but a typical extension is more likely 60 days to six months. There is an inherent conflict between the special servicers and the AAA certificate holders that is currently being worked on by several trade associations.
A loan matures with no replacement lender, and the property is worth more than the current debt. Assume that a loan has matured and the property is worth more than the debt. Remember, there is no “lender” anymore. There are no relationships to protect, and there are no “pockets of money” to use for refinance. Special servicers, although legally allowed by the PSA to forgive any portion of the debt, rarely do so because often that would negatively affect one or more of the bondholders at the expense of the others. Instead, the Special Servicer, on behalf of the conduit, will almost always foreclose.

Hopefully, there will eventually be some standardization of response for requests for extensions and loan modifications. But it will probably take congressional action to amend REMIC rules to grant Special Servicers the authority to allow for more frequent and longer extensions or other remedies common to bank “work-outs.” Of course, any such changes will be fought by the large companies that are the AAA bondholders because they are the ones likely to be adversely affected.

All of the aforementioned parties are “fiduciaries” for the pool; that is, they are required to act in the best interest of all the investment classes of certificate holders.

  In this economic environment it is critical to understand your specific loan terms, and any default risks they may pose, so you can plan accordingly. The “friendly banker” you knew five years ago may not be the party you will be dealing with tomorrow.

 Beth again:  Well, yeah, we’ve figured that out.   Also, the banker was never that friendly.  He also wasn’t even a banker. 

6 thoughts on “Wells Fargo Admits No Lender After Securitization

  1. Where are the Texas Attorneys who know how to fight these big banks? So, let me lay my situation out because right now, I am pissed and literally, can’t take anymore of Bank of America, Bank of New York Mellon and there lies. It would clearly take a total moron of a Judge in a Texas court to rule for Bank of America. Here is why. Let’s start with Origination of Mortgage calling Lender “America’s Wholesale Lender” (SEE NASH VS BANK OF AMERICA). Clearly this judge knew what they were doing. But…. Before I ever closed on property alleged 155397447 (Account Number) was already in Pool (see SEC CWABS, Inc Asset Backed Certificates Series 2007-2) Trustee Bank of New York Mellon fka Bank of New York. However, We have to throw MERS, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc® into the mix because there is an Assignment done 4-1/2 years after Pool Closed and after Countrywide, Bank of America Merger in 2008. Bank of America said my Lender, Bank of New York Mellon, denied a loan modification but I have in writing from Bank of New York Mellon THEY ARE NOT A LENDER, HAVE NO SAY IN LOAN MODIFICATIONS…… BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS THE TRUSTEE FOR INVESTORS AND DOES NOT OWN LOAN OR PROPERTY. OK, so…….. Why then is it that Bank of New York Mellon acted as Lender and initiated foreclosure through Servicer Bank of America? Now, it get’s even better and I know this is all a similar story of everyone who is going through this same thing BUT CAN’T TRUST ANYONE… NOBODY….. Bank of America and Bank of New York Mellon conspired together to create documents to illegally foreclose on property by doing Assignment of Deed of Trust to Bank of New York Mellon. Bank of New York Mellon in turn denies being Lender, Bank of America writes many times over they are the Servicer and describe the role of the Servicer and then the BOMBSHELL HITS…… The 1099-A to file with the IRS. Yes, Acquisitions and Abandonment of Property by the “LENDER” BANK OF AMERICA YES 1099-A READS LENDER IS BANK OF AMERICA. In the Harris County Appraisal District, Bank of New York Mellon recorded a Deed to my property at 2616 Mill Creek Drive claiming they took possession of the property on 4/20/2015 through foreclosure. On July 27, 2015, Stonecrest Acquisitions files Deed without Warranty claiming that Stonecrest purchased property from Bank of New York Mellon at a foreclosure sale. After over a dozen letters from Bank of America Attorney Blank and Rom Thomas Ciliano, he writes Bank of New York Mellon is owner of Loan and Property, Bank of New York Mellon denies owning loan or property has no say and Bank of America is the Servicer, Harvey Law Group Attorney for Debt Collector Bank of America Servicer on behalf of Creditor Bank of New York Mellon forecloses on property. Please somebody tell me how in the Hell, Bank of America went from Servicer to Lender and is sending me a 1099-A for Acquisitions and abandonment of Property. Fed up in Harris County, Pasadena TX and sick and tired that Lawyers don’t know the law or how to help those of us who have lost our property. There is no foreclosure., There is no mortgage, there is only a Lease. Bank of America considers living in the house for 8 years is income. Bank of America thinks they can be the Servicer, and the Lender, Bank of America lies so much they believe their own lies. All I can say is I want justice and we need Attorney’s that know how to do their jobs and fight for the borrower. Instead they want to take care of the banks because the borrower in their eyes is automatically a looser because they stopped paying their mortgage. OK Lawyers, how about this, how about you telling us who the Lender is…. Who should be receiving the money? Who should be foreclosing? Nobody because the mortgage was turned into an investment and it is no longer a mortgage. The 1099-A is a CONTINUATION OF THE FRAUD AGAINST THE BORROWER.


  2. Okay now can you track “where the money goes” after the servicer shows up with a credit bid at the foreclosure sale? I am sure the “Controlling Class Representative ” would love to know who is pocketing the money from the eventual sale of the roperty.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s